Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1327 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1327-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORColdicott et al raise several issues.1 How do students acquire clinical skills without practising on patients? Rather than contribute to the ethical debate, we propose that alternatives be explored to support students in the development of clinical skills.
Coldicott et al recognise that technical skill is just one element of competence in vaginal examinations. The ability to communicate sensitively is crucial, and indeed each patient's definition of an intimate examination must be central. Practising on an anaesthetised patient provides no opportunity to develop communication skills and reduces vaginal examination to a purely technical task. Observing a student performing a vaginal examination provides no guarantee of what is palpated. Conventional pelvic manikins have similar limitations, but pressure sensitive manikins, fitted with electronic sensors, can provide feedback on which organs are palpated and with what force.2 3
We have developed an approach to teaching and learning clinical skills that
links manikins
Debra Nestel, lecturer
Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia debra.nestel@med.monash.edu.au
Roger Kneebone, senior lecturer in surgical education
Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY
teaching tomorrow's doctors Commentary: Respecting the patient's integrity is the key Commentary: Teaching pelvic examination
putting the patient first