Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1327 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1327
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORColdicott et al highlight concerns about teaching intimate examinations.1 Our current programme for fifth year medical students could serve as a model for dealing with these legitimate problems. The project was approved by our ethics committee.
Twenty healthy volunteers were recruited as intimate examination assistants and screened for their characteristics and motivation. All gave their signed informed consent to participation. They received an introduction in anatomy, technical examination, doctor-patient interaction, and feedback training to serve as both patient and teacher. Medical staff were trained in supervising and coordinating the feedback sessions. Students were informed beforehand about the study, and technical skills were taught on manikins. A comprehensive training manual was produced.
Students performed three training sessions (urogenital-rectal,
gynaecological, and breast examination). Each session consisted of two
students (performer and observer), one intimate examination assistant, and one
doctor. All participants were able to voice their feelings and concerns.
Attention
Kristin Hendrickx, general practitioner
kristin.hendrickx@pandora.be
Benedicte De Winter, assistant, skills laboratory, Jean-Jacques Wyndaele, professor of urology
University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
teaching tomorrow's doctors Commentary: Respecting the patient's integrity is the key Commentary: Teaching pelvic examination
putting the patient first