Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1326 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1326
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMy personal experience of intimate examination dates back 23 years and illustrates how even explicit informed consent can fail to protect a patient.1
I was 20, a first year preclinical student, awaiting surgery for a large hiatus hernia, which had been causing supraventricular tachycardia. I was admitted to Adden-brooke's Hospital two weeks before clinical school finals. Preoperatively, somewhere between 12 and 20 people in white coats came to examine me. As I did not realise that medical students could examine patients unsupervised I assumed they were doctors.
All performed chest and abdominal examinations. Three performed breast examination (none performed otorhinolaryngological examination). All performed vaginal or rectal examination. Three performed both, which I found particularly distressing. Consent was obtained in the form of "if you don't mind, I need to," and I consented by my physical position and an embarrassed "OK."
I was upset by the examinations and felt
Mary Selby, principal general practitioner
Newmarket Rookery Medical Centre, Newmarket CB8 8NW happyselby@btinternet.com
teaching tomorrow's doctors Commentary: Respecting the patient's integrity is the key Commentary: Teaching pelvic examination
putting the patient first