Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1224-1225 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1224
Medical editors need effective self regulation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
As with members of any groupbe they doctors, politicians, or cardinalssome editors misbehave. Managing their misbehaviour is complicated by widespread devotion to the principle of editorial freedom, a devotion that is energetically promoted by editors. When an organisation takes the nuclear option of firing its editoras the American Medical Association did in 1999the roof falls in.1 2 How can the circle of editorial independence and the need to discipline erring editors, of whom there are many, be squared? The answer may be self regulation, some sort of general medical journalists council.
Regular readers of the BMJ will imagine that it is my own misbehaviour that prompts me to meditate on the theme of editorial misconduct. My sins in the past two months include publishing an obituary seen by many as a hatchet job,3
4 publishing research funded by the tobacco industry that implied that passive smoking did not kill,5 carrying an offensive
Richard Smith, editor
BMJ
Read all Rapid Responses