BMJ  2003;326:1105 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1105

News

GPs vote for "contractus interruptus"

Zosia Kmietowicz

London

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

General practitioners voted to delay a ballot on whether to accept their new contract last week and demanded the renegotiation of key "flaws" that many doctors believe could ruin the profession.

Dr John Chisholm: For the contract to start in 2004, a "yes" vote is needed by 23 June

ROBERT BELL

At the special conference convened by the BMA to debate the new contract, announced in February, local medical committee chiefs voted by 139 to 127 for delaying the ballot by up to six months if necessary. However, a rider to the motion gave the General Practitioners Committee authority to hold a ballot sooner if members felt that GPs' concerns had been appropriately addressed.

Contract negotiators warned that the ballot had to take place by 13 June for it to be included in the government's current legislative programme. If the contract missed the deadline, GPs could have to wait up . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

GPs accept contract, but consultants ask for ballot on industrial action
Zosia Kmietowicz
BMJ 2003 326: 1415. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The failures of two contracts
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 1097-1098. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ