BMJ 2003;326:1039 ( 10 May )

Letters

Parents are not homogeneous

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Young et al offer an important insight into the rub between parental desires to protect their offspring from unpleasant news while at the same time recognising their child's autonomy.1 However, the paper falls short in two respects.

Firstly, although Young et al say that they did not address the influence of sex, this factor cannot be simply discounted without explanation. Upholding the argument that qualitative data need analysis by sex is the recognition of the existence of women's health movements and policies and of literature pertaining to men's health on the basis of salient social theories. Young et al needed to recognise that the discourse of male children and young adults did not or did, in some way, differ from those of their female counterparts.

Secondly, the voices of the mothers and fathers were aggregated into a single factor, that of "the parent." Although not uncommon in family . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Managing communication with young people who have a potentially life threatening chronic illness: qualitative study of patients and parents
Bridget Young, Mary Dixon-Woods, Kate C Windridge, and David Heney
BMJ 2003 326: 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ