Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Young et al offer an important insight into the rub between
parental desires to protect their offspring from unpleasant news while
at the same time recognising their child's autonomy.1 However, the paper falls short in two respects.
Firstly, although Young et al say that they did not address the influence of sex, this factor cannot be simply discounted without explanation. Upholding the argument that qualitative data need analysis by sex is the recognition of the existence of women's health movements and policies and of literature pertaining to men's health on the basis of salient social theories. Young et al needed to recognise that the discourse of male children and young adults did not or did, in some way, differ from those of their female counterparts.
Secondly, the voices of the mothers and fathers were aggregated into a
single factor, that of "the parent." Although not uncommon in
family