Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Determinants of outcome include technical skill, volume of work, and case mix
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Surgery can be a risky business. Members of the public are now attuned to that fact and appreciate that their surgeon's performance is a key determinant of success. Outcome after surgery is of course relatively easy to assess; you survive the operation or you don't, the anastomosis holds or it doesn't, the hernia recurs or it doesn't, and so on. In an era of increased scrutiny it is perhaps no surprise that surgeons feel under pressure or that they account for a third of the referrals to the newly established National Clinical Assessment Authority in England.1
What then are the determinants of surgical performance, and is a poorly
performing surgeon easy to spot? Technical skill is vital, but it is by
no means the only essential ingredient for success. Thorough training,
compassion, sound judgment, good communication skills, honed clinical
skills, and knowledge are all critically important. Surgeons do not
work
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+