Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Problems compromise review's validity
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Deeks et al say that celecoxib has improved gastrointestinal
safety and tolerability compared with traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).1 We have several concerns.
Firstly, Deeks et al reported the papers by Bensen et al, Zhao et al (1999), Simon et al, and Zhao et al (2000) as if they referred to four different trials.1 The papers by Bensen et al and Zhao et al (1999) were, however, merely duplicate reports of one trial, whereas the papers by Simon et al and Zhao et al (2000) reported in duplicate on another trial. Deeks et al either included the same data more than once or mixed up unpublished data with unrelated publications.
Secondly, Deeks et al report similar relative risks for ulcer
complications observed after six months in CLASS's two
trials2: 0.54 (95% confidence interval 0.20 to 1.47) for
study 035 (celecoxib v ibuprofen) and 0.56 (0.19 to 1.66)
for study 102 (celecoxib v diclofenac),
Read all Rapid Responses