BMJ 2003;326:294-295 ( 8 February )

Editorials

Medical experts and the criminal courts

All relevant material must be disclosed, including facts detrimental to the opinion

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The quashing of Sally Clark's conviction for the murder of her sons Christopher and Harry has inevitably been followed by questions about the role of the medical experts, in view of their failure to disclose key evidence and the role such evidence played in securing her conviction.1 The debate has been played out across the media, not least in the pages of the BMJ and on its website. 2 3

Medical experts are called on daily to deliver their opinions in both civil and criminal cases. Critics have focused their attention mostly on criminal trials. The initial involvement of an expert may be through professional duties, as in the case of the forensic pathologist who performs an autopsy and then finds that evidence from the autopsy report is being used by the prosecuting authorities in a criminal trial. Other experts may be called on by the police or by the Crown Prosecution . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Medical experts and the criminal courts
John A M Gall and Neville Davies
BMJ 2003 326: 1037. [Extract] [Full Text]

Protecting children
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Le Fanu, J. (2005). Wrongful diagnosis of child abuse--a master theory. JRSM 98: 249-254 [Full text]  
  • Geddes, J F, Plunkett, J (2004). The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome. BMJ 328: 719-720 [Full text]  
  • Gall, J. A M, Davies, N. (2003). Medical experts and the criminal courts. BMJ 326: 1037-1037 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-based medine and forensic pathology
John J. Plunkett
bmj.com, 9 Feb 2003 [Full text]
Medico-legal audit needed
John A Gall
bmj.com, 11 Mar 2003 [Full text]
Hutton, Kelly and the missing Epidemiology
Yaser Adi MPH, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Re: Hutton, Kelly and the missing Epidemiology
Christopher M Milroy
bmj.com, 8 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Hutton, Kelly and the missing Epidemiology
Andrew Rouse, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Re: Hutton, Kelly and the missing Epidemiology
Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 10 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Hutton, Kelly and the missing Epidemiology
Geoffrey S. Sennett, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Who, where, when and how? A second bite at the cherry.
Alexander R W Forrest
bmj.com, 11 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ