Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Samia A Hurst a Department of
Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
20892-1156, USA, b Unité de Recherche et d'Enseignement en
Bioéthique, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva,
Switzerland Correspondence to: S A Hurst
shurst@cc.nih.gov
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Switzerland has an unusual position on assisted suicide: it is legally condoned and can be performed by non-physicians. Euthanasia is illegal, but there is a debate about decriminalisation that also discusses participation by non-physicians
The involvement of a physician is usually considered a necessary safeguard in assisted suicide and euthanasia. Legislation in Holland, Belgium, and the US state of Oregon all require it, as did the legalisation of euthanasia in Australia's Northern Territories.1-4 Physicians are trusted not to misuse these practices; along with pharmacists they are in control of prescription drugs. Physicians are believed to know how to ensure a painless death, and they are in a position to offer palliative care knowledgeably.
Switzerland seems to be the only country in which the law limits the
circumstances in which assisted suicide is a crime, thereby decriminalising it in other cases, without requiring the involvement of
a physician. Consequently, non-physicians have
Read all Rapid Responses