Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Front cover was highly misleading
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
That small reductions in salt intake (2 g/day) have a small but
significant effect on blood pressure is hardly
surprising.1 Nevertheless, in populations this would have
a large effect on reducing strokes, heart attacks, and heart failure.
Hooper et al do not ask why reducing salt intake in the long term is so
difficult. They claim that the interventions used were intensive, but
most studies gave no details about what advice was offered.
Furthermore, 75% of salt intake comes from processed food.2 This needs to be avoided or contain less salt. None of the studies provided reduced salt foods.
Interpreting the study by Hooper et al is not helped by the
editor writing the front cover of the BMJ, who seems to have
read a different paper and misinterpreted the important positive
findings. The confusion is increased by the authors' press
release,3 which rightly blames the difficulty in
Read all Rapid Responses