Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Potential efficacy of public access defibrillation may be underestimated
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Pell et al provide useful data on the appropriate location of
public access defibrillators.1 Not all of their
conclusions, however, seem to be based on firm evidence.
They say that arrests that occur in obvious sites for locating defibrillators already have the shortest response times, yet only 340 out of 2646 (13%) patients in a suitable site received an ambulance within 3 minutes. Response time is not defined: a detail important in allowing valid comparison with other early defibrillation strategies.
The Department of Health defines this interval as starting when a chief complaint is identified by an ambulance dispatcher and ending when an ambulance stops at the scene. The time taken for a bystander to determine that action is needed and make a 999 call, as well as the time taken by the crew to reach the patient's side and deliver a counter-shock, are excluded.
The complete interval from collapse to first