Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Medical schools should develop effective guidelines and implement them
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this issue, Coldicott et al report an
exploratory survey that shows, among other findings, that up to a
quarter of intimate examinations in anaesthetised or sedated patients
seem not to have had adequate consent from patients
(p 97).1 This paper will generate a firestorm of
controversy, wide media interest, and perhaps even calls for a public
inquiry. Through the controversy, let us keep one point uppermost in
mind: identifying the problem is only half the battle
the other half
is coming up with an effective solution.
The fact that this report has been published at all represents a
triumph of academic freedom. In particular, Coldicott, a medical
student, deserves high praise for seeing this controversial study
through to publication. The medical school examined in the study is
probably not the only medical school in the world with similar
practices, and the authors and their institution have done patients
teaching tomorrow's doctors Commentary: Respecting the patient's integrity is the key Commentary: Teaching pelvic examination
putting the patient first
Read all Rapid Responses