Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Senior vice president of GlaxoSmithKline responds
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
As the senior doctor at GlaxoWellcome and GlaxoSmithKline
who participated in all of the key meetings that resulted in the
withdrawal of Lotronex (alosetron) and the subsequent approval for
reintroduction, I feel compelled to reply to both the article and
editorial on alosetron.
1 2
Moynihan sees a complex web of intrigue where none existed, at least from the viewpoint of GlaxoWellcome and GlaxoSmithKline.1 Here are the key elements of the story from our position.
We had a medical disagreement with the Food and Drug Administration about the aetiology of the serious adverse events occurring in patients taking alosetron. In November 2000 we had several meetings with the administration, which led to a meeting on 28 November where we realised we could not come to agreement on certain key matters. Reluctantly, we decided that we had no viable option but to withdraw the drug voluntarily.
Having withdrawn the drug, we had