BMJ 2002;325:1413-1416 ( 14 December )

Education and debate

How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke

Mi-Kyung Hong, public administration analyst, Lisa A Bero, professor. 

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, Box 0613, San Francisco, CA 94143-0613, USA

Correspondence to: L A Bero Bero@medicine.ucsf.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1981 an influential Japanese study showed an association between passive smoking and lung cancer. This article documents the tobacco industry's attempts to refute this study by producing a credible alternative study

In 1981 Japanese investigator Takeshi Hirayama published a cohort study examining the association of passive smoking and lung cancer among non-smoking wives of smokers in Japan.¹ The study concluded that wives of heavy smokers had up to twice the risk of developing lung cancer as wives of non-smokers and that the risk was dose related. The Hirayama study was influential because it launched an extraordinary amount of critical debate ^{2 3} and has been one of the most frequently cited studies in regulatory proceedings, ^{4 5} risk assessments,⁶ and the media.⁷

The tobacco industry has used a variety of tactics to maintain scientific debate about whether secondhand smoke has any harmful effects. ^{5 6 8-14} We identify and analyse internal tobacco industry documents that describe the industry's . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Passive smoking: Background must be examined

Martin McKee
BMJ 2003 327: 503. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Klesges, R. C., Sherrill-Mittleman, D. A., DeBon, M., Talcott, G. W., Vanecek, R. J. (2009). Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population. Health Educ Res 24: 909-921 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Landman, A., Glantz, S. A. (2009). Tobacco Industry Efforts to Undermine Policy-Relevant Research. AJPH 99: 45-58 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tong, E. K., Glantz, S. A. (2007). Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 116: 1845-1854 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Smith, E. A. (2007). 'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': Tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion. Eur J Public Health 17: 162-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Francis, J. A, Shea, A. K, Samet, J. M (2006). Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses. Tobacco Control 15: iv68-iv76 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ling, P M, Glantz, S A (2005). Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes. Tobacco Control 14: e3-e3 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Neuman, M D, Bitton, A, Glantz, S A (2005). Tobacco industry influence on the definition of tobacco related disorders by the American Psychiatric Association. Tobacco Control 14: 328-337 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Barbeau, E M, Kelder, G, Ahmed, S, Mantuefel, V, Balbach, E D (2005). From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation. Tobacco Control 14: 338-345 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Chapman, S (2005). Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance. Tobacco Control 14: 217-219 [Full text]  
• Yano, E (2005). Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions. Tobacco Control 14: 227-235 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bero, L A, Glantz, S, Hong, M-K (2005). The limits of competing interest disclosures. Tobacco Control 14: 118-126 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tong, E. K., England, L., Glantz, S. A. (2005). Changing Conclusions on Secondhand Smoke in a Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Review Funded by the Tobacco Industry. Pediatrics 115: e356-e366 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tong, E K, Glantz, S A (2004). ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia. Tobacco Control 13: ii118-ii124 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Neilsen, K, Glantz, S A (2004). A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings. Tobacco Control 13: i20-29 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Schroeder, S. A. (2004). Tobacco Control in the Wake of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement. NEJM 350: 293-301 [Full text]  
• McKee, M. (2003). Passive smoking: Background must be examined. BMJ 327: 503-503 [Full text]  
• Malone, R E, Bero, L A (2003). Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 546-548 [Full text]  
• Bauer, J. E., Hyland, A., Li, Q., Steger, C., Cummings, K. M. (2005). A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Smoke-Free Worksite Policies on Tobacco Use. AJPH 95: 1024-1029 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Cilia-a Missing Link

John L. Evers, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Dec 2002 [Full text]

Passive smoking and tobacco money

Hiroshi Kawane, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Jan 2003 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>