BMJ 2002;325:903 ( 19 October )

Letters

Heterogeneity among Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis is key to racial inequities

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Feder et al recently confirmed and extended observations pointing to inequity in the invasive management of coronary disease.1 They conclude that the inequity is not due to physician bias or socioeconomic status and emphasise as explanations patients' understanding of risks and benefits, and barriers in the healthcare system after placement on a waiting list.

Similar observations in the United States have led to intense debate, particularly on the potential role of racism. In my overview on racism, which focused on the extensive data on racial inequalities in treating heart disease in the United States, I concluded that the emerging, somewhat reluctant, interpretation is that racism is important.2 Whittle et al included racism as a component of the explanation for their findings in a US study on the same theme.3 I also wrote that even if patients' preferences are partly responsible for the disparities, racism will not be wholly . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Ethnic differences in invasive management of coronary disease: prospective cohort study of patients undergoing angiography
Gene Feder, Angela M Crook, Patrick Magee, Shrilla Banerjee, Adam D Timmis, and Harry Hemingway
BMJ 2002 324: 511-516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mindell, J., Klodawski, E., Fitzpatrick, J. (2008). Using routine data to measure ethnic differentials in access to coronary revascularization. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 45-53 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ