Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Feder et al recently confirmed and extended observations
pointing to inequity in the invasive management of coronary disease.1 They conclude that the inequity is not due to
physician bias or socioeconomic status and emphasise as explanations
patients' understanding of risks and benefits, and barriers in the
healthcare system after placement on a waiting list.
Similar observations in the United States have led to intense debate,
particularly on the potential role of racism. In my overview on racism,
which focused on the extensive data on racial inequalities in treating
heart disease in the United States, I concluded that the emerging,
somewhat reluctant, interpretation is that racism is
important.2 Whittle et al included racism as a component
of the explanation for their findings in a US study on the same
theme.3 I also wrote that even if patients' preferences are partly responsible for the disparities, racism will not be wholly