Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Qasim et al reported the safety and efficacy of nurse initiated
thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial
infarction.1 The stepwise improvement in thrombolysis
times over the three phases is impressive and a credit to the medical
and nursing staff of the coronary care unit. We hope that phase 4 will
continue to show improvement, enabling the 2003 national service
framework targets to be met.
The emergency department gets merely a cursory mention in the context of reasons and causes of delays in treatment. It seemed not to be deemed important in streamlining the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Yet during phase 1 it was one of the "two main reasons" for delays identified.
Phase 2 does not address this problem. Patients with suspected acute
myocardial infarction in the emergency department were transferred to
the coronary care unit for further assessment by a nurse. Presumably
the patient had already seen a
Read all Rapid Responses