BMJ 2002;325:835 ( 12 October )

Letters

Ethical market in organs

    Market of organs is unethical under any circumstances
    Proposal is problematic
    Defending the indefensible?

Market of organs is unethical under any circumstances

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Although we admire Harris and Erin's commitment to solve the dilemmas posed by a shortage of organs, we strongly disagree not only with their conclusions but also with their assumption---namely, that the selling and buying of human organs can be made ethical. 1

Harris and Erin harness their theory to the laudable commitment to raise donation rates but arrive at the definition of an ethical market by promoting a system that seems to depend only on a restricted group of citizens---those who find the monetary incentives proposed appealing.

Firstly, the integrity of the human body should never be subject to trade. Can we truly define this system as ethical because the selling and buying of organs is administered by the state?

Secondly, how can a system be called ethical when it implicitly penalises the weakest people and exacerbates discrimination based on census? Will a healthy well-off citizen . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Genes and ethics
BMJ 2002 325: i. [Full Text] [PDF]

An ethically defensible market in organs
John Harris and Charles Erin
BMJ 2002 325: 114-115. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kishore, R R (2005). Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited. J. Med. Ethics 31: 362-365 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ