Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Su Mason a Northern
and Yorkshire Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Academic Unit of
Epidemiology and Health Services Research, University of Leeds, Leeds
LS2 9NG, b School of Healthcare Studies, University of
Leeds, c Health Care Practice Research and Development Unit, University
of Salford, Salford M5 4WT Correspondence to: S Mason medsam@leeds.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Complementary medicine is increasingly popular for treating many different problems. Doctors and patients need evidence about complementary treatments, but randomised controlled trials need to be carefully designed to take holism into account and avoid invalid results
You think that by understanding one, you can understand two, for one and one is two. But to understand two, you must first understand "and." Sufi saying1
Complementary medicine should be evaluated as rigorously as
conventional medicine to protect the public from charlatans and unsafe
practices,2-5 but many practitioners of complementary medicine are reticent about evaluation of their practice. Sceptics maintain that this is because of fear that investigations will find
treatments ineffective and threaten livelihoods. In defence, many
practitioners argue that research methods dissect their practice in a
reductionist manner and fail to take into account complementary medicine's holistic nature leading to invalid evaluation.
|
Summary points
|
| |
Nature of complementary medicine |
|---|
Complementary medicine comprises many different disciplines, a
wide spectrum
Read all Rapid Responses