BMJ 2002;325:683-684 ( 28 September )

Papers

    Women's attitudes to the sex of medical students in a gynaecology clinic: cross sectional survey
    Commentary: Patients as partners in medical education

Women's attitudes to the sex of medical students in a gynaecology clinic: cross sectional survey

Norma O'Flynn, NHS R&D national primary care training fellowJanice Rymer, senior lecturer in obstetrics and gynaecology

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE11 6SP

Correspondence to: Norma O'Flynn norma.o'flynn@kcl.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In Tomorrow's Doctors the General Medical Council recommended that medical schools construct a list of procedures in which students should show competence by the time they qualify.1 There is general acceptance that such core skills include passing a speculum, taking a smear, and performing a competent pelvic examination. Anecdotal evidence from medical students, particularly male students, is that experience in this area is difficult to obtain. This is not a problem confined to the United Kingdom. In response to a similar perception among their male students, staff at the University of California studied patients' views on the involvement of medical students in the women's visits in an outpatient gynaecological and obstetric setting.2 They found that 81% of patients accepted the involvement of students during a gynaecological visit, with no preference for a particular sex. However, the study did not directly address the issue of intimate examinations. We surveyed women attending . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study
John Benson, Thelma Quince, Arthur Hibble, Thomas Fanshawe, and Jon Emery
BMJ 2005 331: 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Draper, H, Ives, J, Parle, J, Ross, N (2008). Medical education and patients' responsibilities: back to the future?. J. Med. Ethics 34: 116-119 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Shann, S, Wilson, J D (2006). Patients' attitudes to the presence of medical students in a genitourinary medicine clinic: a cross sectional survey. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 52-54 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Benson, J., Quince, T., Hibble, A., Fanshawe, T., Emery, J. (2005). Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study. BMJ 331: 89- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Riordan, D. C (2004). Interaction strategies of lesbian, gay, and bisexual healthcare practitioners in the clinical examination of patients: qualitative study. BMJ 328: 1227-1229 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ