Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 's cover and headline exaggerated importance of study's findings
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The randomised controlled trial on mechanical methods of
reducing blood transfusion in cardiac surgery by McGill et al is
laudable, but we challenge the BMJ for highlighting this paper on the front cover with the headline: "Cell salvage reduces the
need for a transfusion."1 We believe that the journal
has a responsibility not to exaggerate the perceived importance of findings, either in press releases or by other
means.2
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
The authors themselves highlighted the main limitations of the study in their discussion, and we believe that such declarations are important safeguards against widespread use of the described methods without further scientific evaluation.
The authors comment on the high cost of transfusion, but they did not
include a cost analysis in their study. We understand the risks
associated with transfusion and agree that these in themselves may
justify any added cost. However, introducing strict transfusion
guidelines and monitoring their use