Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In Britain the Alder Hey scandal brought to public attention the
fact that body material left over after diagnostic procedures may be
used for teaching and research
usually without the patient's consent.
Paul van Diest argues that, Alder Hey apart, this practice has not
caused protest, mainly because the alternative would be to discard the
material. He argues that self determination is not an overriding
principle in the case of material that is otherwise thrown away. Julian
Savulescu, however, cites cases where patients have felt "used"
when their tissue has been kept without their consent. He argues that
the best way to retain tissue for research is through educating and
encouraging people to donate their redundant tissues, not by taking
them without their
knowledge
Paul J van Diest Department of Pathology,
VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam,
Netherlands
pj.vandiest@vumc.nl
During diagnostic procedures larger samples of body
fluids and tissues are usually collected than strictly necessary
for primary testing, "just in case." The big advantage is,
Read all Rapid Responses