BMJ 2002;325:340 ( 10 August )

Letters

Another way of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---We would like to suggest that there is an easier and more cost effective method of screening the population for hyperlipidaemia than that discussed in Marks et al's paper.1

The diagnosis of familial hyperlipidaemia requires a family history. In primary care one would expect patients to have a check of blood pressure at least every five years. A screen of family history might on average add 30 seconds to this consultation.

In our practice (list size 5200), using a cost of £25/h, this would produce an additional cost of £436 if the 2097 eligible patients (aged over 25 and under 55) were screened. From the 95% we have screened we found 670 patients with a family history of coronary heart disease, of whom 22 have a cholesterol concentration of >7.5 mmol/l. Using the published figure for opportunistic screening in primary care on the 670, we calculate a cost of £6927, or £2487 per case . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cost effectiveness analysis of different approaches of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia
Dalya Marks, David Wonderling, Margaret Thorogood, Helen Lambert, Steve E Humphries, and H Andrew W Neil
BMJ 2002 324: 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gray, J, Jaiyeola, A, Whiting, M, Modell, M, Wierzbicki, A S (2008). Identifying patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: an informatics-based approach in one primary care centre. Heart 94: 754-758 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ