Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Helen Snooks a Centre for
Postgraduate Studies, Swansea Clinical School, University of Wales,
Swansea SA2 8PP, b School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton,
Southampton SO17 1BJ, c London Ambulance Service NHS
Trust, London SE1 8SD, d Centre for Primary Health Care Studies, University of
Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL Correspondence to: H Snooks h.a.snooks@swan.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Ambulance services and emergency departments are under
increasing pressure as the number of emergency calls continues to
rise
but in many cases, patients do not need immediate clinical care.
Helen Snooks and colleagues consider the alternatives to the standard NHS response and review the current literature
The number of emergency (999) calls received by ambulance services in the United Kingdom has risen consistently over recent years. Ambulance services must respond to calls immediately by sending vehicles staffed by paramedics, with flashing lights and sirens. All patients have to be taken to an accident and emergency department. This response is not always appropriate, and it can result in inefficient use of resources and unnecessary risks to the general public, patients, and paramedics.
The NHS Plan and the recent consultation document Reforming
Emergency Care have emphasised the importance of trying new
approaches to deliver appropriate care.
1 2
They highlight
the need to consider
Read all Rapid Responses