Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
One star for trying
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The self proclaimed aim of Health Secretary Alan
Milburn's star awarding exercise, rating the performance of trusts, is
simple. It is "to provide patients and the general public with
comprehensive, easily understandable information on the performance of
their local health services."1 No one could argue with
that. But execution is another matter. Two dilemmas arise when
constructing a summary measure of performance in an organisation as
complex and heterogeneous as the NHS. On the one hand, how
"comprehensive" can it be while remaining "easily
understandable?" Sophistication can all too easily turn into
mystification. On the other hand, can the same sort of exercise meet
the requirements of the multiple audiences involved? The general public
apart, these include ministers and their officials, the boards of
trusts as well as the doctors, nurses, and others working in them, and
the commissioners of services. Attempting to meet everybody's
expectations may mean frustration all
Read all Rapid Responses