Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Helen Lambert a Department
of Social Medicine, Bristol University, Bristol BS8 2PY, b Department of Public Health Sciences, King's College London,
London SE1 3QD Correspondence to: H Lambert
H.Lambert@bristol.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
As a response to concerns about the standard of qualitative research, attention has focused on the methods used. However, this may constrain the direction and content of qualitative studies and legitimise substandard research. Helen Lambert and Christopher McKevitt explain why anthropology may be able to contribute useful insights to health research
Qualitative methods are now common in research into the
social and cultural dimensions of ill health and health care. These methods derive from several social sciences, but the concepts and
knowledge from some disciplinary traditions are underused. Here we
describe the potential contribution of anthropology, which is based on
the empirical comparison of particular societies. Anthropology has
biological, social, and cultural branches, but when applied to health
issues it most commonly relates to the social and cultural dimensions
of health, ill health, and medicine.1
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| |
What is wrong with qualitative research? |
|---|
Explaining qualitative research to health professionals has been
an essential step in gaining acceptance of
Read all Rapid Responses