Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Unevaluated screening inhibits informed consent
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Population screening for individuals at high risk of getting coronary heart disease is an explicit objective in primary care. The national service framework for coronary heart disease recommends that general practitioners and primary healthcare teams should identify all people at significant risk of cardiovascular disease, but who have not yet developed symptoms, and offer them appropriate advice and treatment to reduce their risk.1 In contrast to the current policy of maximising participation, Marteau and Kinmonth in this issue suggest that helping individuals to become involved in making informed choices may increase their motivation to make changes.2
When the introduction of a national screening programme is being
considered, a proper scientific evaluation should occur. Wilson and
Jungner's criteria are a yardstick against which a screening programme
can be judged (see box).3 Apart from the recognition that
coronary heart disease is an important health problem little
evidence exists that any of the
Read all Rapid Responses