BMJ 2002;324:1586 ( 29 June )

Letters

Clarifications: open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---In our authors' reply to the letter by Barber and Thompson, we stated that further analysis of our data, using their recommended t test on bootstrapped data, had confirmed the results of the non-parametric tests used in our original article.1-3 In other words, open access follow up for irritable bowel disease led to cost savings in secondary care. We have since discovered that a calculation error occurred in our bootstrapping exercise. The further analysis did not, in fact, confirm the statistical significance reported for secondary care, although it did confirm the original result that differences in overall costs (primary, secondary plus patient-borne costs) were not significant. We accept that bootstrapping is the preferred approach and that, on this basis, the study did not demonstrate resource savings in secondary care.

It is unfortunate that Bland's letter, published on bmj.com (bmj.com/cgi/eletters/320/7251/1730#8480) and in the journal,4 draws attention to . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease
Julie A Barber, Simon G Thompson, A Coomarasamy, D Van Der Berg, J G Williams, D R Cohen, and I T Russell
BMJ 2000 320: 1730. [Extract] [Full Text]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ