Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Simon J C Davies a Psychopharmacology Unit, School of Medical
Sciences, Bristol BS8 1TD, b Bristol Central
Community Learning Disability Team, Bristol BS16 1EQ, c Blackberry Hill Hospital, Bristol BS16 2EW, d Liaison
Psychiatry, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW Correspondence to: S J C
Davies simondavies@apexmail.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
When evidence emerges on rare but potentially dangerous drug effects, the Committee on Safety of Medicines needs to act to protect the public. On the basis of clinical experience after guidelines relating to thioridazine were revised, Davies and colleagues argue that directives should take greater account of the risks associated with changing successfully established drug regimens, especially in vulnerable populations such as people with learning disabilities
When new evidence is unearthed of rare but dangerous
side effects of drugs used in current practice, agencies such as the Committee on Safety of Medicines need to review and rewrite
prescription guidelines. When new guidelines restrict the use of a
commonly prescribed agent to a limited range of circumstances, doctors may be left in a dilemma. Patients who do not meet the criteria for
continuing with a drug under revised guidelines, but who benefit from
using it, may have to be exposed to
Read all Rapid Responses