Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ should give equal space to opposing views of new contract
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Lewis and Gillam write as if the new contract for general
practitioners has been accepted by general practice.1 This
is not the case, and indeed there is a preliminary vote [in June] on
whether the framework is acceptable to general practice.
The framework as stated is by no means complete, pensions have not been adequately addressed, the contract has not been priced, and the government still retains the right to unilateral change in any contract.
I hope that the BMJ will not threaten its integrity and
allow those who are opposed to this contract an equal chance to portray their views as Lewis and Gillam have.
| 1. |
Lewis R, Gillam S.
A fresh new contract for general practitioners.
BMJ
2002;
324:
1048-1049 |
One principal buys a new car to celebrate
EDITOR
I would like to inform all readers of the BMJ that
four days after publication of the editorial by Lewis and Gillam I
bought myself a brand new Mercedes car to celebrate our proposed new
contract.1 I also bought one
Read all Rapid Responses