BMJ 2002;324:1158 ( 11 May )

Letters

Over the counter cough medicines for acute cough

    The fact that people keep buying the medicines is itself evidence
    Good quality research is needed
    Gap exists between practice and research

The fact that people keep buying the medicines is itself evidence

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Schroeder and Fahey are right to urge caution in interpreting the results of their systematic review on cough medicines, and their recommendation to change existing guidance on cough medicines in the United Kingdom is not justified.1

Their review considered a heterogeneous group of products that included many different active ingredients from several different drug classes. It is surely impossible to draw from this any meaningful conclusions about over the counter cough medicines as a whole. Many of the products and active ingredients in the reviewed trials are either not available at all in the United Kingdom (moguisteine, bromhexine), are only available on prescription (salbutamol, terfenadine), or are not indicated for the relief of cough (loratidine, terfenadine).

Only 15 trials were included in the review, and only one reported a power calculation. As the authors concede, it seems highly likely that many of the remainder did not include sufficient patients . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of over the counter cough medicines for acute cough in adults
Knut Schroeder and Tom Fahey
BMJ 2002 324: 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

"Cough bottles"
Bruce C McG Williamson, et al.
bmj.com, 14 May 2002 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ