Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Complex, with risks attached, but addresses many of the profession's concerns
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The imposition of the 1990 contract by Kenneth
Clarke was a blow from which professional morale among general
practitioners has never really recovered. For many general
practitioners it marked the end of a golden age. The "Red Book" has
long been criticised as bureaucratic and inflexible, and the launch of
personal medical services pilots in 1998 was an acknowledgment of the
need for change. Currently, allocation of resources only poorly
reflects patients' needs; the contract is highly focused on the
individual practitioner and fails to recognise adequately the role of
the practice team; quality measures are sparse and crudely applied; and
perverse incentives often serve to reward poor quality services. A
recent BMA survey exposed high levels of stress, poor morale, and
planned early retirement or exit from the profession.1 The
proposals for a new national contract, announced on 19 April jointly by
the NHS confederation and the British Medical Association, mark an
Read all Rapid Responses