Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Fernando Althabe Latin American Center for
Perinatology, Pan American Health Organization, World Health
Organization, Casilla de Correos 627, Montevideo 11000, Uruguay Correspondence
to: F Althabe althabef@clap.ops-oms.org
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Current scientific evidence shows that routine episiotomy
is not justified: it has no benefit for mother or infant, increases the
need for perineal suturing and the risk of complications to the healing
process at seven days post partum, produces unnecessary pain and
discomfort, and has potentially harmful long term
effects.1-3 We report rates of episiotomy in primiparous
women in Latin American hospitals according to characteristics of
hospitals and caregivers.
| |
Participants, methods, and results |
|---|
We conducted a hospital based descriptive study based on
data routinely collected in a perinatal information
system.4 We analysed data from 122 hospitals in 16 Latin
American countries that had reported 416 852 deliveries between 1995 and 1998. We selected hospitals reporting more than 35 spontaneous
vaginal deliveries in primiparous women, which is the sample size
required to give a 95% confidence interval of 10% either way for an
episiotomy rate of 90%. This selection comprised 105 hospitals in 14 countries, which reported 94 472 spontaneous vaginal deliveries in
primiparous
Read all Rapid Responses