Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Selection bias in prevalence data is difficult to rule out
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
To sociologists, Boydell et al's findings are
counterintuitive.1 One would expect economic deprivation
(at neighbourhood level) to be a decisive factor for an increased
incidence of mental illness. But it is surprising to learn that the
lower the proportion of non-white ethnic minorities in a local area the
higher the incidence of schizophrenia in those minorities (controlled
for economic deprivation).
As an explanatory hypothesis the authors point to overt discrimination and institutionalised racism as sources of stress, which can be alleviated by people making use of social capital within the ethnic group. This hypothesis surely necessitates further testing and debate. It is a pity that non-white ethnic minority groups had to be considered as one homogeneous group on an aggregate level. The social networks and levels of social cohesion may be different for different ethnic groups, and follow up research should be able to distinguish these.
Boydell et
Read all Rapid Responses