Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Minnis et al in their vignette based report claim that racial
stereotyping that occurs at the first psychiatric interview is
insufficient to account for the inequalities in diagnosis of schizophrenia between black and white men in the United
Kingdom.1 Their findings are not surprising. What people
say and what they do are often two quite separate things. Respondents
may have consciously or subconsciously overcompensated for their
prejudices in the current climate of sensitivity to racial issues and
because previous studies in psychiatry have used similar investigative
formats.2
The clinical evaluation that a psychiatrist performs is not simply a
list of objective facts. It is a subjective account of an interaction
between two people. This interaction is fashioned by the perceptions of
the evaluator and the importance he or she chooses to give to certain
information. The relative importance of different parts of the history
depends on the culture