Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Nicolas Terry Center for Health Law Studies,
Saint Louis University School of Law, 3700 Lindell Blvd, St Louis, MO
63108, USA terry@slu.edu
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Technologically mediated health care raises problems of quality of information, cross border practice, and patient confidentiality. Nicolas Terry probes the legal aspects of these complexities, and Benedict Stanberry adds a European perspective
Identifying the regulatory agenda for health information is not difficult. The quality of publicly available health information, cross border medical and pharmacy practice, and the privacy of medical records appear on the radar screens of most public health and consumer protection organisations. Left unregulated, any of these issues can cause considerable harm. Each issue also embodies difficult tensions: state versus federal rights, increased access to care versus quality assurance, and confidentiality versus professional discourse.
US state and federal legal systems have not achieved a coherent
approach to regulating the dissemination of health information. Furthermore, the American experience will not always transfer directly
to publicly funded medicine and government initiatives. Nevertheless
the American experience with private sector ehealth is
Read all Rapid Responses