Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Heinke Kunst a Department of Respiratory Medicine, St
Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, b Maastricht University,
6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands, c Birmingham Women's Health
Care NHS Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, d Tower Hill
Medical Centre, Birmingham B42 1LJ Correspondence to: K S Khan
k.s.khan@bham.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The internet provides an easily accessible forum to
disseminate both accurate and inaccurate health information
so it has the potential to facilitate but also to jeopardise healthcare provision.
1 2
Many criteria have been alleged to capture the quality of health websites,
3 4
but the validity of
these criteria needs to be examined.5 The source,
currency, and hierarchy of the evidence posted on a website may be used
to judge its credibility
that is, the power of inspiring belief. If
these criteria were fulfilled, the contents of the website would be
expected to be accurate. We determined whether websites that seem to be
credible provide accurate health information.
| |
Methods and results |
|---|
We determined the relation between credibility features and
accuracy of contents of 121 websites that provided information on five
common health topics: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23 sites),
ankle sprain (36), emergency contraception (32), menorrhagia (9), and
female sterilisation (21). These sites were identified either by
searching
Read all Rapid Responses