Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Alternative explanation for results may exist
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The results of Murray et al's two studies on interactive
multimedia decision aids are compatible with the conclusions that both
they
1 2
and the author of the accompanying
editorial3 draw: that such products are generally
acceptable; that they lead to a substantial decrease in patients'
decisional conflict; that the interactive nature of the software allows
information to be personalised; that high technology decision aids,
though expensive now, are likely to cost less per case in the future;
that it does not much matter that the technology was obsolete and the
evidence had moved on by the time the papers were published; and that
such technologies should be introduced more widely.
However, the results are also compatible with the opposite conclusion:
that most patients prefer not to use (or even try out) multimedia
decision support aids (hence the disappointingly low recruitment); that
the absolute difference made to decisional conflict and