Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Mann et al and Hu et al list several shortcomings in the trials
reviewed by Hooper et al that explain why dietary treatments for
patients with coronary heart disease were ineffective.1-3 Inferior studies with negative results are prevalent, but where is the
positive evidence that justifies the dietary recommendations?
Mann et al point to the improved outcome in the subgroup analysis of the five prolonged trials. But in that analysis Hooper et al excluded the Sydney diet-heart study, where total mortality was significantly increased, and included the Veterans Administration Trial, which was biased by a significant higher number of heavy smokers in the control group.
Mann et al also say that there is an enormous body of descriptive
epidemiology that supports the link between dietary fat, cholesterol
concentrations, and coronary heart disease. The accumulated epidemiology actually strongly contradicts such a link, as illustrated by a systematic review.4 In
Read all Rapid Responses