Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Antenatal screening has human costs
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In their study Gilbert et al made no provision for the cost of
counselling.1 I still hear from women who go for antenatal
care and are screened without consent or counselling.
1 2
Some of these women regret entering a conveyor belt process that ends
up with an invasive procedure that causes a high rate of fetal loss.
Gilbert et al, by highlighting the economic implications of screening,
remind us that mothers and their unborn babies continue to be used in
what is primarily a cost saving procedure.
Doubt has already been cast upon the public health benefits of
screening and the ethical component of such programmes.3 No pregnancy is replaceable. The cost of screening in human terms has
not been evaluated. By excluding the costs of counselling and
disregarding mothers' rights and the worth and value to society of
children with Down's syndrome, the study by Gilbert et al