Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John G F Cleland Department of
Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, University of Hull, Kingston upon
Hull HU16 5JQ J.G.Cleland@medschool.hull.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
On p 71 we publish the latest in a series of meta-analyses from the Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Here John Cleland argues that, despite the vast size of these meta-analyses, the evidence in support of aspirin preventing atherosclerotic events is still inconclusive. One adverse effect of the belief that aspirin is more effective than it is, he argues, is the neglect of more effective drugs for preventing heart disease and stroke.
The third meta-analysis from the Antithrombotic Trialists'
Collaboration, published in this issue, contains data on over 100 000
patients at high risk of atherosclerotic events, representing more than
250 000 patient years of follow up.1 This meta-analysis and its predecessors form the major argument for the current widespread fashion of prescribing aspirin to such patients.
2 3
It is an enormous body of research and the collaboration is to be
congratulated for having gathered so much data. However, quality as
well as quantity
Read all Rapid Responses