Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The editorial by Edworthy shows the dangers of external
commentary on what is most useful for developing
countries.1 How can we measure the comparative impact of
teleconsultation in Uzbekistan or Cambodia with teleconsultation in
snowbound northern Canada, telemetry in Norway supporting elderly
people at home, or teleradiology avoiding long painful journeys in
remote parts of the British Isles? What values do we use
economic,
social, quality adjusted life years, consumer feedback, political
position, or provider satisfaction?
More importantly, how do we measure the impact of telemedicine on the
health systems of developing countries? Will strengthening secondary
care for a few disadvantage basic primary care or environmental health
for the many? Will investment in the required rural telecommunications be at the expense of providing drinkable water? Will developing countries too be seduced by the expensive impact of technology led
tertiary care for the few, while ignoring the endemic impact