Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Framework's claim that GPs should devote more time to preventing coronary heart disease needs scrutiny
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The national service framework for coronary heart disease
states that "additional coronary heart disease prevention activities
. . . will consume time, effort and resource. Primary care teams will have to give careful consideration to how resources used on lower value and lower priority activities might be redirected to the high priority, high value treatments
identified."1 The framework does not give any evidence
justifying the claim that traditional services are low value or
quantify the benefit of high value treatments.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
I estimated the maximum benefit of activities aimed at reducing
mortality by considering patients registered with a typical singlehanded general practitioner in northwest Lancashire because the
area has the highest mortality from coronary heart disease in the
United Kingdom.
2 3
Each year such a practice registers about 22 births and deaths.3 Since the framework's
objective is to reduce mortality among those under 75 I estimated the
maximum impact of the activities by assessing how