Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
We agree with Smith and Pell's interpretation of their own and
others' results that first teenage pregnancies are not associated with
adverse outcomes, but we disagree with their conclusion that the
associations they found between second teenage pregnancy and risk of
preterm delivery and stillbirth indicate causation.1 The
most likely explanation is a combination of inadequate control for
socioeconomic position, which the authors concede, and differences in
the interval between pregnancies among teenage compared with older mothers.
Differences in pregnancy spacing cannot be rejected as an explanation, as the authors attempt to do, without its impact in this study being assessed. Furthermore, the authors do not consider the possible impact of differences in antenatal care between pregnant teenagers and older women in any of their analyses.
Health professionals should not accept without challenge the myth that
teenage pregnancy is an important public health problem in the way that
Read all Rapid Responses