Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Study was bound to conclude that cannabinoids had limited efficacy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Campbell et al's paper on whether cannabinoids are effective
and safe in the management of pain purports to be qualitative and
systematic,1 but it is neither. Because it focused on two clinically questionable synthetic cannabinoids and oral
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) without providing any focus on the
synergistic components of herbal cannabis, and examined only certain
facets of the broad topic of pain, it ensured that a conclusion of
limited efficacy was reached. That is not news.
What is surprising, in contrast, is that the authors chose to broaden the alleged impact of their limited investigation to relegate the use of cannabis and cannabinoids to a back seat in future analgesic applications. This contention is not supported by their limited data.
I see nothing published about pioneering British doctors and their
clinical successes with cannabis extracts in a myriad of painful
conditions between 1840 and 1940.2-4 I see virtually nothing of
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+