Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
No doubt should be cast on efficacy of cognitive behavioural interventions
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
We applaud Imrie et al for conducting a rigorous, randomised
clinical trial to reduce sexually transmitted infections in gay
men.1 We have, however, concerns about the conclusions drawn from this comparatively small scale study to all cognitive behavioural interventions.
Firstly, to see changes in sexually transmitted infections as a result of an intervention, we need to see changes in safer sexual behaviours, such as increased use of condoms. The trials reported by Imrie et al did apparently not produce significant changes in safer sexual behaviour. Therefore, it was to be expected that no changes in the incidence of sexually transmitted infections were seen either.
Secondly, the fact that this trial was apparently not successful should
not cast any doubt on the efficacy of cognitive behavioural interventions. Other, much larger, cognitive behavioural trials carried
out with high risk populations in the United States and Thailand have
been effective.2-4 Effectiveness