BMJ 2001;323:865 ( 13 October )

Letters

Requests for EEG services in a district general hospital

    Distinction needs to be made between audit and value judgment
    Authors' reply

Distinction needs to be made between audit and value judgment

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Audits of investigations are complex, as their value to the physician depends on numerous factors, not least confidence in their own clinical diagnosis and the report. Many different specialties use electroencephalography (EEG) services. This audit imposes the values of an individual without references to practice guidelines and requires critical appraisal.

Smith et al suggest that the unrestricted access and non-specialist reporting in their district general hospital in north Wales is typical, but they do not mention that these practices are contrary to the regional guidelines that their trusts helped to formulate. 1 2 All seven EEG departments in southeast Wales comply.

One author (DS) is credited with grouping EEG requests into "influenced management," "justifiable," and "inappropriate." Requests were considered inappropriate when a diagnosis (epilepsy) had been made on clinical grounds or an unsatisfactory attempt had been made to achieve a clinical diagnosis, usually failure to obtain an eyewitness account of . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Requests for electroencephalography in a district general hospital: retrospective and prospective audit
D Smith, R Bartolo, R M Pickles, and B M Tedman
BMJ 2001 322: 954-957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ