BMJ 2001;323:765-766 ( 6 October )

Editorials

Qualitative research in systematic reviews

Has established a place for itself

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The recent publication by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination of the second edition of the guidance on undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness deserves to be warmly welcomed, for many reasons.1 Perhaps chief among these is the increased recognition given to the diverse types of evidence that can contribute to systematic reviews. This suggests that the rigid insistence on controlled trials as the sole source of evidence on effectiveness that characterised the beginnings of the evidence based healthcare movement is fading. Qualitative research is now given explicit consideration in the new guidance. This is consistent with other recent recommendations emphasising the contribution of qualitative evidence to healthcare evaluation.2 The argument for giving a place to qualitative research in systematic reviews seems to have been won. There remain several issues, however, that need to be addressed in making the role of qualitative evidence in reviews more systematic.

The . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stead, M., McDermott, L., Hastings, G. (2007). Towards evidence-based marketing: the case of childhood obesity. Marketing Theory 7: 379-406 [Abstract]  
  • Braye, S., Preston-Shoot, M. (2007). On Systematic Reviews in Social Work: Observations from Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Law in Social Work Education. Br J Soc Work 37: 313-334 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Allender, S., Cowburn, G., Foster, C. (2006). Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res 21: 826-835 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6: 27-44 [Abstract]  
  • Walter, F. M., Emery, J., Braithwaite, D., Marteau, T. M. (2004). Lay Understanding of Familial Risk of Common Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research. Ann Fam Med 2: 583-594 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dixon-Woods, M, Shaw, R L, Agarwal, S, Smith, J A (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 223-225 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thomas, J., Harden, A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R., Brunton, G., Kavanagh, J. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ 328: 1010-1012 [Full text]  
  • Russ, S A, Kuo, A A, Poulakis, Z, Barker, M, Rickards, F, Saunders, K, Jarman, F C, Wake, M, Oberklaid, F (2004). Qualitative analysis of parents' experience with early detection of hearing loss. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 353-358 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hills, M. D., Carroll, S., O'Neill, M. (2004). Vers un modele d'evaluation de l'efficacite des interventions communautaires en promotion de la sante : compte-rendu de quelques developpements Nord-americains recents1. Promotion & Education 11: 17-21  
  • Hepworth, J. (2004). Public Health Psychology: A Conceptual and Practical Framework. J Health Psychol 9: 41-54 [Abstract]  
  • Hawker, S., Payne, S., Kerr, C., Hardey, M., Powell, J. (2002). Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically. Qual Health Res 12: 1284-1299 [Abstract]  
  • Culliford, L. (2002). Spiritual care and psychiatric treatment: an introduction. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 8: 249-258 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Still learning
Annabelle Mark
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Good news
Gareth Lloyd
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Exclusion of qualitative studies shows fundamental incomprehension of appropriate methods
Graham R Williamson
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2001 [Full text]
online copy of Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness
John Galloway
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Reflections on new methods of integrating different types of evidence in systematic reviews
Jonathan Shepherd
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2001 [Full text]
QUALITY INDICATOR RESEARCH
Khalid Alkhouly, et al.
bmj.com, 22 May 2002 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview