BMJ 2001;323:528 ( 8 September )

Editorials

Measuring the social impact of research

Difficult but necessary

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The main aim of health research is to improve the health of people. Yet the performance of researchers tends to be measured by the scientific quality of their research rather than by its impact on health. This is unsatisfactory, even nonsensical, so a committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences is trying to devise a way of measuring the social impact of applied health research. Its first report was discussed at a recent meeting in Amsterdam,¹ and the academy now plans to experiment with methods of measuring social impact.

In an ideal world all research would be of high quality and have considerable social impact by improving health. But in the real world scientific quality and social impact do not always go together. Quality to scientists tends to mean originality of subject, thought, and method. Much research that scientists judge of high quality has no measurable impact . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Beyond the impact factor

Geoff Watts
BMJ 2009 338: b553. [Extract] [Full Text]

Inequalities and research need to be balanced

Woody Caan
BMJ 2002 324: 51. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Watts, G. (2009). Beyond the impact factor. BMJ 338: b553-b553 [Full text]  
• Trochim, W. M., Marcus, S. E., Masse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Weld, P. C. (2008). The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives: A Participatory Integrative Mixed-Methods Approach. American Journal of Evaluation 29: 8-28 [Abstract]  
• van Driel, M. L., Maier, M., Maeseneer, J. D. (2007). Measuring the impact of family medicine research: scientific citations or societal impact?. Fam Pract 24: 401-402 [Full text]  
• Phaneuf, M.-R., Lomas, J., McCutcheon, C., Church, J., Wilson, D. (2007). Square Pegs in Round Holes: The Relative Importance of Traditional and Nontraditional Scholarship in Canadian Universities. Science Communication 28: 501-518 [Abstract]  
• de Leeuw, E. (2006). Health promotion impact factor: join up, no translation. HEALTH PROMOT INT 21: 257-258 [Full text]  
• Byrne, F, Chapman, S (2005). The most cited authors and papers in tobacco control. Tobacco Control 14: 155-160 [Full text]  
• Del Mar, C., Askew, D. (2004). Building Family/General Practice Research Capacity. Ann Fam Med 2: S35-S40 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bryar, R. M. (2003). Practitioner research: An approach to developing research capacity in primary care. Journal of Research in Nursing 8: 101-114 [Abstract]  
• Caan, W. (2002). Inequalities and research need to be balanced. BMJ 324: 51-51 [Full text]  
• Van Diest, P J, Holzel, H, Burnett, D, Crocker, J (2001). Impactitis: new cures for an old disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 54: 817-819 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-based medicine and the social impact of research

Nancy Yanes-Hoffman
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2001 [Full text]

Balancing Inequalities (and Research)

Woody Caan
bmj.com, 22 Sep 2001 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>