BMJ 2001;323:400 ( 18 August )

Letters

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care

    Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice
    Designating sex specific total cholesterol targets may be useful
    Inhouse clinics may help better to manage patients with heart disease

Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---The paper by Hippisley-Cox et al makes an important contribution to the literature on sex differences in health service use.1 Primary care physicians act as gatekeepers to specialist health services, yet this critical role in the healthcare system has been largely ignored by researchers in this field.2

Hippisley-Cox et al said that their findings suggest a systematic bias towards men in terms of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. Such a conclusion is premature. The results may reflect biased decision making, but they may also have been determined by patient preferences or mutual agreement between doctor and patient. In common with other research in this area, the charge of biased decision making has been made as a result of a process of exclusion. Once it has been shown that clinical need (in this case a diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease) cannot account for the finding that women are . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey
Julia Hippisley-Cox, Mike Pringle, Nicola Crown, Andy Meal, and Alison Wynn
BMJ 2001 322: 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • DeWilde, S, Carey, I M, Bremner, S A, Richards, N, Hilton, S R, Cook, D G (2003). Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?. Heart 89: 417-421 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Sex and secondary prevention
Mike Banning
bmj.com, 24 Aug 2001 [Full text]
discriminators, right and wrong..
L S Lewis
bmj.com, 25 Aug 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ