Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The paper by Hippisley-Cox et al makes an important contribution
to the literature on sex differences in health service use.1 Primary care physicians act as gatekeepers to
specialist health services, yet this critical role in the healthcare
system has been largely ignored by researchers in this
field.2
Hippisley-Cox et al said that their findings suggest a systematic bias
towards men in terms of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart
disease. Such a conclusion is premature. The results may reflect biased
decision making, but they may also have been determined by patient
preferences or mutual agreement between doctor and patient. In common
with other research in this area, the charge of biased decision making
has been made as a result of a process of exclusion. Once it has been
shown that clinical need (in this case a diagnosis of ischaemic heart
disease) cannot account for the finding that women are
Read all Rapid Responses